Tag Archives: Achatz

Evaluation Colleagues, Mentors, and Friends

drbarbarasugland(Dr. Barbara Sugland 1960-2010)  As an internal evaluation director at a foundation, I no longer “practice” evaluation in the same way as when I was a consultant in my pre-philanthropy years in Washington, D.C.  I often worry that my skills can get a little rusty when my daily role is one of managing, translating, organizing, and planning resources for evaluations and other knowledge and data-related tasks.  I rely greatly on consultants and colleagues to keep me current (and honest) in how evaluation should be practiced.

I am grateful for the many consultants and colleagues who have helped me,  pushed my knowledge, and strengthened my approach.  ORS-Impact (Jane, Anne, Sarah, and team), Innovation Network (Johanna, Veena, Ehren, Ann, Kat), Center for Evaluation Innovation (Julia and Tanya), Community Science (David, Kien, Scott), TCC Group (Pete, Jared and Deepti), and Aspen Institute (Anne, Andrea and Pat).  And without a doubt all my Casey and HCF colleagues, especially Audrey Jordan.

And as many have noted about the recent AEA conference, our field’s best evaluators are often accessible and generous with their advice and interest in others’ work.  Eleanor Chelimsky was my first “teacher” and the GAO PEMD evaluation reports from the 1980s and 1990s were my first textbooks when I began as an evaluator in 1990 before attending grad school.  Beverly Parsons, Bob Williams, David Fetterman, Michael Patton, Hallie Preskill, Ricardo Millet, Patti Patrizi, Anne Kubisch, Prue Brown, and many others have always been considerate and generous with their time, feedback, comments, advice and even humor.

These colleagues continue to stimulate my work but I still spend part of every day (not just every workday) thinking about and missing the wisdom, ethics, commitment, and friendship of two brilliant evaluators who are no longer with us.  Dr. Mary Achatz and Dr. Barbara Sugland were two evaluators who taught me much about evaluation methods but even more about the purpose and mission of evaluation to contribute to improving the lives of the most vulnerable and driving towards social justice and equity.  The American Evaluation Association’s Guiding Principles for Evaluators assert respect for people, integrity, honesty, and responsibility for the public welfare–and these women were exemplars of these principles.  My own knowledge and practice were greatly influenced and informed by these two extremely modest yet enormously skilled professionals who gave the most attention and respect to the least powerful resulting in more genuine, appropriate, accurate, and influential evaluations.  They both also lived as guides, teachers, mentors and coaches and there are many others who can attest to their heart and skills.  And they are friends I miss every day.

See pages 20-21 in Leila Fiester’s case study on Plain Talk for an example of Mary’s respectful approach to working in and with community

Hear Barbara’s words on supporting and empowering our youth especially youth of color  http://vimeo.com/47253167

And the Dr. Barbara Sugland Foundation dedicated to continuing her legacy (where I am proud to be a director)